Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: .LRN Consortium - Yet Another Governance Discussion

5: Re: .LRN Consortium - Yet Another Governance Discussion (response to 1)

Posted by Caroline Meeks on 10/04/03 11:32 PM

.LRN license is GPL, the same as OpenACS. .LRN should be distributed with the same copyright as OpenACS. As for the rest of the question, I would like to hear the views of the community.

Are you referring to the code in the first sentance? The code is clearly labled as GPL and MIT is the main copy right holder, correct?

If so I guess the rest would be

.LRN Name
Content on dotLRN.org
Intended for Paper materials produced by the .LRN Consortium marketing or describing .LRN

Al, can you please clarify who currently holds the copy right on the above items?

In case anyone hasn't guessed I vote for GPL!

What do other people think?

7: Re: .LRN Consortium - Yet Another Governance Discussion (response to 5)

Posted by Alfred Essa on 10/04/03 11:46 PM

.LRN license is GPL, so there is no vote involved here.