Forum OpenACS Development: Re: danger: HEAD changed for TIP#42,43 - could be unstable

Gee - I don't know that I'm comfortable with that understanding of a "name". That looks more like a "title" to me.

I think if we make something as fundamental as an object's name so complicated, it will really increase the learning curve.

Certainly it needs much discussion!

oh - and has there been any further decision about rolling back Timo's commits? I'd really like head to install, and like Lars said we really want to ship 5.1 asap.
Mark, my example is real-worldish not hypothetical.

Presentation_name should probably not go into acs_objects but rather acs_object_types or a package-dependant acs_object_types_styling table.

I think back then we stuffed the column into a table called acs_objects_description which is very much alike cr_items. Branimir, do you remember where we put the presentation column?