Forum OpenACS Development: Response to What do we do with db_multirow and template::multirow?

Don,

We're totally in line, then.

I like to have separate db_foo and foo to make it clear that one's hitting the DB, the other ain't.

And I'm annoyed that the templating system doesn't follow the conventions from the rest of the system (isn't it funny when geography gets written into code like this?).

So the roadmap should be to eventually get a templating API that follows the conventions of the rest of the API, and have db_multirow separate from a "manual" multirow proc.

You should see the templating system that Jon and I did. I wonder where that is now. :)