Forum OpenACS Development: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep )

Posted by Victor Guerra on 08/31/06 03:07 PM

Again, we are focusing in getting all the test cases
to pass, for core packages. Also we need to start
to clean up the Bug Tracker, so:

Regarding test cases, this test cases still doesnt
pass:

ad_proc_fire_callback
datamodel__named_constraints
datamodel__acs_object_type_check
ad_proc_cache
ad_proc_flush

If you already made this test cases to pass,
please post here and commit your work :).

Plus, we might possibly need new tests on these ones:
ad_page_contract*
ad_progress_bar*
apm_package*
apm_package_instance_new

Regarding Bugs, the goal is to:
- Review and apply patches.
- Review bugs for core packages, resolve or close bugs if necessary, change priorities, etc.
- Write a test case for those bugs that are not-simple to resolve.

Please post here, which test case or bug number
you will be working on.

Remember that we are working on HEAD.
If you need to do testing in ORACLE please
read Emma's post regarding testing in Oracle.

See you at IRC.

For reference, previous Bug Stumps:
http://openacs.org/forums/message-view?message%5fid=471977
http://openacs.org/forums/message-view?message%5fid=467207
http://openacs.org/forums/message-view?message%5fid=461630

2: Re: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ) (response to 1)

Posted by Victor Guerra on 08/31/06 04:28 PM

Just fixed and commited test cases ad_proc_cache and ad_proc_flush

3: Re: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ) (response to 1)

Posted by Adrian Catalan on 08/31/06 04:42 PM

i'll be working on apm_package_instance_new

4: Re: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ) (response to 1)

Posted by Byron Linares on 08/31/06 05:10 PM

Done with "datamodel__named_constraints" it will be commited at the end of the day.

5: Re: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ) (response to 4)

Posted by Emmanuelle Raffenne on 08/31/06 05:49 PM

Byron,

datamodel__named_constraints has allready be done and committed few days after last bug stomp. Please check out the last version.

6: Re: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ) (response to 1)

Posted by Emmanuelle Raffenne on 08/31/06 06:10 PM

I'm starting to work on acs_object_types to make datamodel__acs_object_type_check passed.

7: Re: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ) (response to 6)

Posted by Emmanuelle Raffenne on 08/31/06 09:22 PM

datamodel__acs_object_type_check committed and test pass now.

8: Re: Res: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ) (response to 1)

Posted by vivian Aguilar on 08/31/06 10:32 PM

Done and commited:
acs-tcl/tcl/test
acs-tcl-apm-procs.tcl
1.Test the apm_parameter_register procedure
(test_apm_parameter__register)
2.Test the apm_package_instance_new procedure
(test_apm_package_instance__new )

acs-lang/tcl/test
acs-lang-message-procs.tcl
1. Test that registrates a new message to the BD.

Thanks to Veronica who contribute on this.

9: Re: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ) (response to 1)

Posted by Victor Guerra on 09/13/06 05:49 PM

Here we have the results for this Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ).

Test cases fixed:
- ad_proc_cache
- ad_proc_flush
- datamodel__acs_object_type_check
- test_apm_parameter__register
- test_apm_package_instance__new

New test cases:
- test_message_register: Simple test that registrates a new message to the BD.

Still failing test cases:
- datamodel_named_constraints ( Byron Linares will be working on this one for the next bug stump, since now there are a lot of fails for this test case. )
- ad_context_bar_multirow ( I'll ask Juan Pablo Amaya to fix this one ).

Thanks to everyone helpping on fixing/writting new test cases :).

10: Re: Bug Stump ( 31th Aug & 1st Sep ) (response to 9)

Posted by Victor Guerra on 09/13/06 07:52 PM

Test case image_new is failing b/c there is a missing file
for the test: /packages/acs-content-repository/tcl/test/test-image-1.jpg

I'll add an image so the test passes.