Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: Chat package HEAD branch

Collapse
16: Re: Chat package HEAD branch (response to 15)
Posted by Emmanuelle Raffenne on 06/25/07 10:08 AM
Malte,

For now I've added a dependency to dotlrn on oacs-5-3 branch.

When we branched dotlrn we didn't realize that chat package had changed since the oacs-5-2 version (my bad, sorry). I'll add this item to the .lrn meeting agenda to discuss what to do about it.

Collapse
17: Re: Chat package HEAD branch (response to 16)
Posted by Malte Sussdorff on 06/26/07 09:23 AM
Emmanuelle, just to make sure, my comments were directed in the direction or Telefonica, not you. To my knowledge none of your commits has done anything and I do have the slight suspicion that commits to 5.3 have not been properly rolled back after the decision to commit the changes to HEAD, but I did not want to revert that either.

In my opinion chat should not be dependent on .LRN. If it becomes per design, please make sure to fork it and give it a special name, as I love the package but do not have .LRN installed all the time.

Collapse
19: Re: Chat package HEAD branch (response to 17)
Posted by Emmanuelle Raffenne on 06/26/07 10:15 AM
Malte,

Yes I understood. But still, my bad has been to branch without checking the state of the package...

Thanks for testing and catching all those issues. As I said in my previous post, we'll discuss it at the .lrn meeting today. If you can join, please do (16:00 gmt).