Andrew, Your feedback is much appreciated and thank you for taking the time to articulate it. Some of your points are right on.
I will only comment on .LRN. You are correct that we need to have a crisper statement about the relationship between .LRN and OpenACS. Malte's reply is probably the most accurate. We are working on revamping the .LRN web site to coincide with the release of .LRN v2.0 and this will also lead to a more consistent messaging through out.
BTW. .LRN is preferred now over dotLRN.
