Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: member 0 shouldn't be part of Registered Users?

Collapse
2: Re: member 0 shouldn't be part of Registered Users? (response to 1)
Posted by Don Baccus on 11/22/03 01:50 AM
I don't know how it got into the registered users group unless someone added it through the acs-subsite UI somehow (debatable) or did something else.

"The Public" consists of user 0 (party 0 in 4.6.2) UNION members of registered users.

With 5.0 we've made user 0 be a full user which means we can support "anonymous coward" style user input transparently by granting the right privileges on "The Public" ...

Anyway you should leave it in the "The Public" group, remove from the "Registered Users" group ...