Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: Mission Statement for OpenACS

Collapse
Posted by Caroline Meeks on
Last weekend I attended a pair of nonprofit technology conferences in Philadelphia.  There was tremendous interest in Open Source.

The attendees at the conferences spoke of open source software sharing values with nonprofits. I'd like our Mission Statement to be accessible to nonprogrammers and help them understand the degree to which their values are aligned with OpenACS.

Primarily the nonprofits look to Open Source to give to them. They want free code, they want features, they want usability.  They don't think about what they can give back to us.  But once they understand our community model and the idea occurs to them that they could give back, they seem very receptive to participating in a community.

OpenACS is making huge progress technically.  I think we are more ready then ever to benefit from non-programmer volunteers and leaders.

A mission statement is just one step towards goals such as increasing nonprofit users and sites; nonprogrammer volunteers and perhaps becoming a nonprofit ourselves and getting grants directly.

With that background, please comment on the actual content of the Mission Statement. Our code is good because everyone thinks about the underlying processes of how things are done. It’s the way great programmers think.  I've noticed great marketing and publicity people don't seem to think that way. ;)

Collapse
Posted by C. R. Oldham on
Primarily the nonprofits look to Open Source to give to them. They want free code, they want features, they want usability. They don't think about what they can give back to us.

Caroline,

Speaking as the IT director for one of the larger (I think) nonprofits using OpenACS, let me state how important it has been to me for us to give back. I think our record here in the community speaks for itself there. However, I will agree that most nonprofits are not as fortunate as we are to have an "IT department", and it's only when there is an IT department or a savvy consultant involved that any return to the community can take place. Otherwise (and in many ways rightfully so) the nonprofit just doesn't have time to focus on the tools underlying their core business. They would much rather go buy an off-the-shelf solution that meets 60-70% of their needs and live without the unmet 30-40%.

Collapse
Posted by Alfred Werner on
I agree - the non-profits have been instrumental in the survival of OpenACS. I know I for one have also been adding 'contribute back to open source' clauses in my recent commercial contracts as well - nobody seems to be balking at it - they realize they are getting a tremendous value in software primarily because others have done the same in the past. A sign of maturity? I hope so ...