Forum .LRN Q&A: Response to dotLRN Governance

Collapse
Posted by Jun Yamog on
I agree with Michael, have a marketing site somewhere. But the bugtracker, forum, etc. be in Openacs.org site.

These are my reasons:

  • We only have one account for both.
  • It will show the technical relationship between dotLRN and OpenACS, that dotLRN runs on top of OpenACS.
  • A good number of users will belong to the same community
  • It will show the capabilities of OpenACS as being a REAL COMMUNITY PLATFORM. Subsites, shared forum, etc.

As far as I am concerned I want to put out the political, governance, etc. away from the decision of making dotLRN as a subsite in OpenACS.org. My only concern is convinience and having OpenACS prove that it is a community platform.