Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: Some other issues regarding LORS

Collapse
2: Re: Some other issues regarding LORS (response to 1)
Posted by Dave Bauer on 02/06/07 06:55 PM
Editing a LORS course is not done. The feature to add xowiki content and assessments to a course is experimental. I can deactiviate those features on the 5.3 branch.

Under normal use the only way to build a course is with an external editor.

Collapse
3: Re: Res: Re: Some other issues regarding LORS (response to 2)
Posted by Olga C. Santos on 02/06/07 07:37 PM
However, we do need to have assessment (IMS-QTI) integrated in lors (SCORM). If I upload a SCORM1.2 course with a IMS-QTI zip file as a resource, I expect to have it uploaded to Assessment and to have it run in Assessment when I navigate within SCORM tree. But I'm offered to download the zip file. This other option could be a way to cope with that integration.
Collapse
5: Re: Res: Re: Some other issues regarding LORS (response to 3)
Posted by Matthew Coupe on 02/07/07 10:47 AM
Hi Olga, a little unrelated but which editor do you use for creating your IMS-QTI assessments?

I agree too, it should really be able to use the assessment module within the LORS player. That would be an ideal situation.

Collapse
6: Re: Res: Re: Res: Re: Some other issues regarding LORS (response to 5)
Posted by Olga C. Santos on 02/07/07 11:05 AM
Carl: which AT are you using to generate SCORM content, instead of Reload?

Matthew: so far, I haven't had time to experiment with an IMS-QTI and I'm using an example I had don't know from where. It's in my plans, however. I've heard good things about Respondus, so it will be my first try. Some years ago in aLFanet project, I had some experiences with Canvas Learning, but I did not recommnend it.

Olga