Forum OpenACS Development: Re: Preliminary vision statement open for discussion

Collapse
Posted by Torben Brosten on
I agree with Walter's thoughts/suggestion to first help re-work dotLRN into OpenACS 4.7.

This may not be practical for thesis work on PM, however. So, running the first two phases in parallel may work best.

Collapse
Posted by Jeroen van Dongen on
What exactly do you mean with 'rework dotLRN into openacs'?

Can I interprete that as 'taking the general bits out of dotLRN and put them into a package on their own'?

In that case I couldn't agree more. Question then becomes what bits should be taken out and how to be repackaged?

Logical things could be:
- the portal stuff (already a separate package)
- generalized version of 'community' (i.e. departements are communities, project-teams are communities, ...)
- ???

This is exactly my question - what functionality should go in the 'umbrella' packages and what will eventually be dotWRK.