In general, a package is a unit of software that serves a single well-defined purpose. That purpose may be to provide a service directly to one or more classes of end-user, (e.g., discussion forums and file storage for community members, user profiling tools for the site publisher), or it may be to act as a building block for other packages (e.g., an application programming interface (API) for storing and querying access control rules, or an API for scheduling email alerts). Thus, packages fall into one of two categories:
OpenACS Applications: a "program or group of programs designed for end users" (the Webopedia definition); also known as modules, for historical reasons. Examples of applications include Forums and News.
An installation of the OpenACS includes the OpenACS Kernel, some services that extend the kernel's functionality, and some applications intended for end-users. Packages function as individual pieces of subsites. A subsite can contain multiple application and service instances that provide the end-user with capabilities and content customized to the particular subsite.
This architecture supports the growth of collaborative commerce. For example, Jane User starts a forum focusing on the merits of View Cameras by creating an instance of the Forum application for her personal subsite on an OpenACS Installation. Jack User discovers Jane's forum and includes a link to it in his subsite. As interest in Jane's forum grows, she creates a subsite specializing in providing information about View cameras. This subsite now includes several package instances beyond Forum; it could potentially include its own Ecommerce capabilities (ala Yahoo! Shopping). This could include a knowledge management application that allows users to spread expertise about view cameras and a portal application that links to reliable camera models and resellers. Any subsite enabled package that is added to the OpenACS installation through APM is another potential package instance that can become part of Jane's View Camera subsite.
The APM provides an architecture for packaging software, making instances of that software available to subsites, specifying configuration parameters for each instance, and managing the creation and release of new packages.
Prior to ACS 3.3, all packages were lumped together into one monolithic distribution without explicit boundaries; the only way to ascertain what comprised a given package was to look at the top of the corresponding documentation page, where, by convention, the package developer would specify where to find:
the data model
the Tcl procedures
the user-accessible pages
the administration pages
Experience has shown us that this lack of explicit boundaries causes a number of maintainability problems for pre-3.3 installations:
Package interfaces were not guaranteed to be stable in any formal way, so a change in the interface of one package would often break dependent packages (which we would only discover through manual regression testing). In this context, any of the following could constitute an interface change:
renaming a file or directory that appears in a URL
changing what form variables are expected as input by a page
changing a procedural abstraction, e.g., a PL/SQL or Java stored procedure or a Tcl procedure
changing a functional abstraction, e.g., a database view or a PL/SQL or Java stored function
changing the data model
This last point is especially important. In most cases, changing the data model should not affect dependent packages. Rather, the package interface should provide a level of abstraction above the data model (as well as the rest of the package implementation). Then, users of the package can take advantage of implementation improvements that don't affect the interface (e.g., faster performance from intelligent denormalization of the data model), without having to worry that code outside the package will now break.
A typical ACS-backed site only uses a few of the modules included in the distribution, yet there was no well-understood way to pick only what you needed when installing the ACS, or even to uninstall what you didn't need, post-installation. Unwanted code had to be removed manually.
Releasing a new version of the ACS was complicated, owing again to the monolithic nature of the software. Since we released everything in the ACS together, all threads of ACS development had to converge on a single deadline, after which we would undertake a focused QA effort whose scale increased in direct proportion to the expansion of the ACS codebase.
There was no standard way for developers outside of ArsDigita to extend the ACS with their own packages. Along the same lines, ArsDigita programmers working on client projects had no standard way to keep custom development cleanly separated from ACS code. Consequently, upgrading an already installed ACS was an error-prone and time-consuming process.
Consistent use of the APM format and tools will go a long way toward solving the maintainability problems listed above. Moreover, APM is the substrate that will enable us to establish a central package repository, where developers will be able publish their packages for other OpenACS users to download and install.
For a simple illustration of the difference between ACS without APM (pre-3.3) and ACS with APM (3.3 and beyond), consider a hypothetical ACS installation that uses only two of the thirty-odd modules available circa ACS 3.2 (say, bboard and e-commerce):
APM itself is part of a package, the OpenACS Kernel, an OpenACS service that is the only mandatory component of an OpenACS installation.
The OpenACS is a platform for web-based application software, and any software platform has the potential to develop problems like those described above. Fortunately, there are many precedents for systematic solutions, including:
Borrowing from all of the above, OpenACS 3.3 introduces its own package management system, the OpenACS Package Manager (APM), which consists of:
a standard format for APM packages (also called "OpenACS packages"), including:
version numbering, independent of any other package and the OpenACS as a whole
specification of the package interface
specification of dependencies on other packages (if any)
attribution (who wrote it) and ownership (who maintains it)
web-based tools for package management:
obtaining packages from a remote distribution point
installing packages, if and only if:
all prerequisite packages are installed
no conflicts will be created by the installation
configuring packages (obsoleting the monolithic OpenACS configuration file)
upgrading packages, without clobbering local modifications
uninstalling unwanted packages
a registry of installed packages, database-backed and integrated with filesystem-based version control
web-based tools for package development:
creating new packages locally
releasing new versions of locally-created packages
The design chosen for APM was meant to satisfy the following constraints:
The process of authoring a package must be as simple as possible.
Strict conventions must be established that provide a set of canonical locations and names for files and patterns, for OpenACS application development.
The processes of installing, upgrading, and using packages must be straightforward and accessible through a web-based UI.
Package instances must be able to have subsite-specific content available at an easily configurable URL.
All of these requirements were met, but at the cost of development simplicity. As Packages demonstrates, a set of strict directory conventions are required in order for a package to use APM. This contrasts with the apparent simplicity available to developers of the OpenACS 3.3 system. However, while the system has become more complex for developers to build packages, this complexity is easily managed and is compensated for by additional capabilities.
For example, to make a new application available to the system, a developer must:
Create the necessary files to support the data model, Tcl API, and UI pages.
Put the files in the correct locations for APM to be aware of them.
Use APM to create a new package and enable it.
Use the Site Map facility to create an instance of the package, mount it on an appropriate URL, and set parameters for that particular instance.
While this is complex, especially to a new OpenACS developer, the documentation walks the developer through each of these steps. Moreover, from following these steps, the package can be subsite specific, available to subsites across the system, and be available for distribution to other OpenACS installations without doing a monolithic upgrade or reinstall.
The APM is composed of systems for accomplishing a set of package-related tasks. Each of these tasks comprise a feature area that has an API, data model, and a UI:
Authoring a Package
Maintaining Multiple Versions of a Package
Creating Instances of the Package
Specifying Configuration Parameters for each Instance
Authoring a Package
Full instructions on how to prepare an OpenACS package are available in Packages. The API here can be invoked manually by a package's data model creation script, but need not to be used. This API is part of the APM PL/SQL package.
-- Informs the APM that this application is available for use. procedure register_application ( package_key in apm_package_types.package_key%TYPE, pretty_name in apm_package_types.pretty_name%TYPE, pretty_plural in apm_package_types.pretty_plural%TYPE, package_uri in apm_package_types.package_uri%TYPE, singleton_p in apm_package_types.singleton_p%TYPE default 'f', spec_file_path in apm_package_types.spec_file_path%TYPE default null, spec_file_mtime in apm_package_types.spec_file_mtime%TYPE default null );
The procedure above registers an OpenACS application in the APM.
It creates a new OpenACS object and stores information about the
package, such as its name, in the APM data model. There is an
analogous procedure for OpenACS services, called
To remove an application from the system, there are the calls
-- Remove the application from the system. procedure unregister_application ( package_key in apm_package_types.package_key%TYPE, -- Delete all objects associated with this application. cascade_p in char default 'f' );
cascade_p only if
you want to completely remove the package from the OpenACS.
In order to determine if a particular package exists in the
system, use the
predicate. It returns 1 if the specified
package_key exists in the system, 0
function register_p ( package_key in apm_package_types.package_key%TYPE ) return integer;
Maintaining Multiple Versions of a Package
While the package authoring API provides a means for registering
a package, some information about a package is version dependent.
For example, between versions, the owner of a package, its vendor,
its URI, and its dependency information may change. The API for
package versions allows this information to be specified. All of
these APIs are part of the
apm_package_version PL/SQL package.
To create a new package version, use the
function new ( version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE default null, package_key in apm_package_versions.package_key%TYPE, version_name in apm_package_versions.version_name%TYPE default null, version_uri in apm_package_versions.version_uri%TYPE, summary in apm_package_versions.summary%TYPE, description_format in apm_package_versions.description_format%TYPE, description in apm_package_versions.description%TYPE, release_date in apm_package_versions.release_date%TYPE, vendor in apm_package_versions.vendor%TYPE, vendor_uri in apm_package_versions.vendor_uri%TYPE, installed_p in apm_package_versions.installed_p%TYPE default 'f', data_model_loaded_p in apm_package_versions.data_model_loaded_p%TYPE default 'f' ) return apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE;
In order to use this function, an existing
package_key must be specified. The
version_name parameter must
follow a strict convention:
A major version number
at least one minor version number. Although any number of minor version numbers may be included, three minor version numbers is sufficient and is the convention of software developers.
One of the following:
d, indicating a development-only version
a, indicating an alpha release
b, indicating a beta release
No letter at all, indicating a final production release
In addition, the letters
b may be followed by another integer,
indicating a version within the release.
For those who like regular expressions:
version_number := ^[0-9]+((\.[0-9]+)+((d|a|b|)[0-9]?)?)$
So the following is a valid progression for version numbers:
0.9d, 0.9d1, 0.9a1, 0.9b1, 0.9b2, 0.9, 1.0, 1.0.1, 1.1b1, 1.1
To delete a given version of a package, use the
procedure delete ( package_id in apm_packages.package_id%TYPE );
After creating a version, it is possible to edit the information
associated with it using
function edit ( new_version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE default null, version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE, version_name in apm_package_versions.version_name%TYPE default null, version_uri in apm_package_versions.version_uri%TYPE, summary in apm_package_versions.summary%TYPE, description_format in apm_package_versions.description_format%TYPE, description in apm_package_versions.description%TYPE, release_date in apm_package_versions.release_date%TYPE, vendor in apm_package_versions.vendor%TYPE, vendor_uri in apm_package_versions.vendor_uri%TYPE, installed_p in apm_package_versions.installed_p%TYPE default 'f', data_model_loaded_p in apm_package_versions.data_model_loaded_p%TYPE default 'f' ) return apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE;
Versions can be enabled or disabled. Enabling a version instructs APM to source the package's libraries on startup and to make the package available to the OpenACS.
procedure enable ( version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE ); procedure disable ( version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE );
Package versions need to indicate that they provide interfaces for other software. An interface is an API that other packages can access and utilize. Interfaces are identified as a URI and a version name, that comply with the specification of a version name for package URIs.
-- Add an interface provided by this version. function add_interface( interface_id in apm_package_dependencies.dependency_id%TYPE default null, version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE, interface_uri in apm_package_dependencies.service_uri%TYPE, interface_version in apm_package_dependencies.service_version%TYPE ) return apm_package_dependencies.dependency_id%TYPE; procedure remove_interface( interface_id in apm_package_dependencies.dependency_id%TYPE, version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE ); procedure remove_interface( interface_uri in apm_package_dependencies.service_uri%TYPE, interface_version in apm_package_dependencies.service_version%TYPE, version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE );
The primary use of interfaces is for other packages to specify required interfaces, known as dependencies. A package cannot be correctly installed unless all of its dependencies have been satisfied.
-- Add a requirement for this version. A requirement is some interface that this -- version depends on. function add_dependency( requirement_id in apm_package_dependencies.dependency_id%TYPE default null, version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE, requirement_uri in apm_package_dependencies.service_uri%TYPE, requirement_version in apm_package_dependencies.service_version%TYPE ) return apm_package_dependencies.dependency_id%TYPE; procedure remove_dependency( requirement_id in apm_package_dependencies.dependency_id%TYPE, version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE ); procedure remove_dependency( requirement_uri in apm_package_dependencies.service_uri%TYPE, requirement_version in apm_package_dependencies.service_version%TYPE, version_id in apm_package_versions.version_id%TYPE );
As new versions of packages are created, it is necessary to compare their version names. These two functions assist in that task.
-- Given a version_name (e.g. 3.2a), return -- something that can be lexicographically sorted. function sortable_version_name ( version_name in apm_package_versions.version_name%TYPE ) return varchar; -- Given two version names, return 1 if one > two, -1 if two > one, 0 otherwise. -- Deprecate? function compare( version_name_one in apm_package_versions.version_name%TYPE, version_name_two in apm_package_versions.version_name%TYPE ) return integer;
Creating Instances of a Package
Once a package is registered in the system, it is possible to create instances of it. Each instance can maintain its own content and parameters.
create or replace package apm_application as function new ( application_id in acs_objects.object_id%TYPE default null, instance_name in apm_packages.instance_name%TYPE default null, package_key in apm_package_types.package_key%TYPE, object_type in acs_objects.object_type%TYPE default 'apm_application', creation_date in acs_objects.creation_date%TYPE default sysdate, creation_user in acs_objects.creation_user%TYPE default null, creation_ip in acs_objects.creation_ip%TYPE default null, context_id in acs_objects.context_id%TYPE default null ) return acs_objects.object_id%TYPE; procedure delete ( application_id in acs_objects.object_id%TYPE ); end apm_application;
Just creating a package instance is not sufficient for it to be served from the web server. A corresponding site node must be created for it. As an example, here is how the OpenACS API Documentation service makes itself available on the OpenACS main site:
declare api_doc_id integer; begin api_doc_id := apm_service.new ( instance_name => 'OpenACS API Browser', package_key => 'acs-api-browser', context_id => main_site_id ); apm_package.enable(api_doc_id); api_doc_id := site_node.new ( parent_id => site_node.node_id('/'), name => 'api-doc', directory_p => 't', pattern_p => 't', object_id => api_doc_id ); commit; end; / show errors
Specifying Configuration Parameters for each Instance
A parameter is a setting that can be changed on a package
instance basis. Parameters are registered on each
package_key, and the values are associated
with each instance. Parameters can have default values and can be
of type 'string' or 'number.' There is support with
this API for setting a number of minimum and maximum values for
each parameter, but for most instances, the minimum and maximum
should be 1. It is useful to allow or require multiple values for
packages that need to store multiple pieces of information under
one parameter. Default values are automatically set when instances
are created, but can be changed for each instance.
All of the functions below are in the APM PL/SQL package.
-- Indicate to APM that a parameter is available to the system. function register_parameter ( parameter_id in apm_parameters.parameter_id%TYPE default null, parameter_name in apm_parameters.parameter_name%TYPE, description in apm_parameters.description%TYPE default null, package_key in apm_parameters.package_key%TYPE, datatype in apm_parameters.datatype%TYPE default 'string', default_value in apm_parameters.default_value%TYPE default null, section_name in apm_parameters.section_name%TYPE default null, min_n_values in apm_parameters.min_n_values%TYPE default 1, max_n_values in apm_parameters.max_n_values%TYPE default 1 ) return apm_parameters.parameter_id%TYPE; function update_parameter ( parameter_id in apm_parameters.parameter_id%TYPE, parameter_name in apm_parameters.parameter_name%TYPE, description in apm_parameters.description%TYPE default null, package_key in apm_parameters.package_key%TYPE, datatype in apm_parameters.datatype%TYPE default 'string', default_value in apm_parameters.default_value%TYPE default null, section_name in apm_parameters.section_name%TYPE default null, min_n_values in apm_parameters.min_n_values%TYPE default 1, max_n_values in apm_parameters.max_n_values%TYPE default 1 ) return apm_parameters.parameter_name%TYPE; -- Remove any uses of this parameter. procedure unregister_parameter ( parameter_id in apm_parameters.parameter_id%TYPE default null );
The following functions are used to associate values with parameters and instances:
-- Return the value of this parameter for a specific package and parameter. function get_value ( parameter_id in apm_parameter_values.parameter_id%TYPE, package_id in apm_packages.package_id%TYPE ) return apm_parameter_values.attr_value%TYPE; function get_value ( package_id in apm_packages.package_id%TYPE, parameter_name in apm_parameters.parameter_name%TYPE ) return apm_parameter_values.attr_value%TYPE; -- Sets a value for a parameter for a package instance. procedure set_value ( parameter_id in apm_parameter_values.parameter_id%TYPE, package_id in apm_packages.package_id%TYPE, attr_value in apm_parameter_values.attr_value%TYPE ); procedure set_value ( package_id in apm_packages.package_id%TYPE, parameter_name in apm_parameters.parameter_name%TYPE, attr_value in apm_parameter_values.attr_value%TYPE );
The central piece of the data model is the
apm_package_types table where each package
is registered. When a new application or service is installed on an
OpenACS instance, a corresponding row in this table is inserted
with information about the type of package, e.g. if the forum package is
installed on your OpenACS server, a row in
apm_package_types will be created, noting
that it's an application package type.
apm_packages table is
used to contain information about the instances of packages currently created
in the system. The
column references the
apm_package_types table to ensure that no
package instance can be created for a type that does not exist.
table contains information specific to a particular version of a
package. Several tables reference this one to provide further
information about the particular version:
apm_package_ownersStores information about the owners of a particular version of a package.
apm_package_dependenciesStores information about what interfaces the package provides and requires.
Parameter information is maintained through two tables:
apm_parametersThis table contains the definition of each of the parameters for a package.
apm_parameter_valuesThis table holds all of the values of parameters for specific package instances.
A number of views are available for obtaining information about packages registered in the APM.
apm_package_version_infoProvides information about all of the versions in the system with information available from the
apm_enabled_package_versionsA view (subset) of the above table with only enabled versions.
The APM's user interface is part of the OpenACS Administration Service. The UI is the primary point of contact with APM by developers and administrators. It is part of OpenACS Administration, because only the site-wide administrator should be able to access it. Thus in order to develop a package, the developer must be granted site-wide administration.
APM has two parameters for configuring how it interacts with the UNIX filesystem, accessible via the Site Map admin page. These parameters need not be changed under most circumstances, but may need to be tweaked for Windows compatibility.
GzipExecutableDirectory This directory points to where the
gunzipprogram can be found for uncompressing
gziparchives. This is needed for the installation of
.apmfiles which are simply
gziped tarballs. Default is
InfoFilePermissionsMode This sets the default UNIX permissions used when creating files using the APM. Default is 775.
APM has been in production since OpenACS 3.3, and as of version 4.0 offers a stable set of features. One major feature planned is integration with the OpenACS Package Repository for automatic dependency satisfaction. When a user tries to install a package that depends on other packages, the APM will contact the package repository, determine what packages depend on it, and offer the user a chance to download and install them all. This improvement offers value to end users by facilitating the extension of their OpenACS systems.
Architecturally, minor improvements to the data model and the specification file are planned to increase modularity. The current implementation puts all package specification information in a single file. This approach has certain advantages, such as centralization, but splitting this information into several files allows for flexible extensions to the APM architecture over time.
APM packages currently lack provisions to verify security information. There are plans to add MD5 timestamps and PGP signatures to packages to enable secure authentication of packages. These steps are necessary for APM to be usable as a scalable method to distribute packages on multiple repositories worldwide.
Another anticipated change is to split the APM UI into separate systems for authoring, maintaining, and installing packages. The current UI presents all of this functionality in one interface and it can be confusing from a usability perspective.
System creator: Bryan Quinn, Jon Salz, Michael Yoon, Lars Pind, Todd Nightingale.
System owner: Bryan Quinn
Documentation author: Bryan Quinn, building from earlier versions by Jon Salz, Michael Yoon, and Lars Pind.