Lars, yes, I think we should check in the whole code as a project and put it under proper CVS:
- It is fully functional.
- It is only somewhat openacs-related, but the fork is *very* fundamental.
- We will have to fix bugs in the "ShareNet" code.
Err, as naming is important - yes we need one. The rights for the name "ShareNet" are owned by Siemens (or by some other company that may have acquired the rights from them). A friend of mine is being "persecuted" for trademark infringement, so I suggest we come up with a name and forget about "ShareNet" altogether.
