Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: Knowledge Management code (Siemens ShareNet) NOT available

In case Siemens will not grant us the rights (which is very likely, since they have more money to do long processes than we have), we will have to program this ourselves, if we want to have it, right?
But what if someone thinks, the people that were developing this in the first place use knowledge for that they were not supposed to have because it belongs to Siemens?
When AD released the Java version under the new licence model there were voices saying "don't look at the code, or they might sue you for stealing it".
Collapse
Posted by Dirk Gomez on

Eh, my knowledge belongs to me :) And as long as you don't violate patents, you can redo stuff from scratch as often as you want.

In general it's not smart to look at code whose copyright may conflict with yours (or your intended copyright) and lift ideas directly. That was probably people's main concern back then.

A knowledge management package done from scratch would look very different anyway: it has to be based on the content repository, its TCL could be roughly based on the survey and/or the cms package, and (I hope) it will be developed for Postgres first and then (maybe) ported to Oracle.

Philip Greenspun's Problem Set 4 would provide a good starting point for the philosophy of such a package. Is that still available?