Forum OpenACS Development: Re: Use of Naviserver
I've witnessed the AOLserver thread with horror (at both sides, frankly) but it does seem like with the organizational support collapsing in AOL we might be better off putting our money on a horse with some momentum behind it.
Granted, this is assuming that the NS community would react well to the sudden influx (and certainly loud input) from the OpenACS community. Anyone (especially apart from the inherently biased project leaders) care to comment on how functional the NS development process is with respect to (mostly user) community input?
basic principle to be not to break things for others and discuss things that may have impact of the existing codebaseWell, most of the "strong opinions" from this community have been expressed when those principles have been ignored. So don't be scared of us :)