This is Don, not Alex ...
Greenpeace apparently has been happily doing this to do extends in loops but I think it has the same double-substitution problem that Lars's original example does, right?
for {set i 1} {$i <= $itemcount} {incr i} {
gp_form -extend -name homepage_edit -form "
{title_$i:text {label {Title $i}}}
{image_$i:gp_image,multiple {label {Image $i}}}
"
I do think the safest might be to subst the element name/type decl as well as the attr portion so we can have both dynamic names and types.
Is there any problem with this that anyone can think of? I wasn't thinking of using ad_form for dynamic forms when I wrote it, it began as an experiment to rapidly create form handling pages when I was writing a bunch of code for Greenpeace.
But clearly being able to create truly dynamic forms is a real plus.
