Sorry, Ben; didn't mean to imply you were slacking off. 😉
I love the name "Open Force," but I'm not sure that it's appropriate for this particular project. Since ACS/pg is (at least for the moment) intimately tied to two existing projects, I think it's important that the name reflect the heritage in a way that attracts ACS and PG developers. In other words, the name should be descriptive marketing.
