It is linked from the acs-core-docs doc/openacs-overview.html file (which was why I went and updated them all). It could be
linked from some more places but I would prefer to figure out
where it will end up when dynamically generated for the
repository first.
I am a big advocate of using the info files for keeping track
of the state of the packages. I would like to
add a couple things to the .info files to make that easier
(in particular, I think rather than owner we should have
maintainer and credits, with maintainer being the person
currently claiming responsibility and credits being anyone
who has worked on the package in the past). Right now it
feels funny to remove the "owner" (even when they have not
worked on the package since acs 4.0 days and have a broken aD
email) because it feels wrong to deprive people of credit
for the original work.
And as I mentioned before I think a general code quality field
would be quite useful as well.
