Don, you have posted many paragraphs, but have not even attempted to refute the point I made, which is that current climate models, modeled on even the most expensive (400 million USD for the Earth Simulator) and fastest supercomputers, are not and cannot be accurate.
Is it reasonable to suppose that you cannot refute the point I have made about these climate models' accuracy?
Will you acknowledge that the fact I posted (not some well-regarded scientists' opinion) is true?
(An aside: Concerning well-regarded scientists and their opinions, I have but two words: "Freud" (since discredited) and "Phrenology". Both were quite well-regarded by the leading thinkers of their day. )
