I apologize for my personal attacks, Patrick.
However you claim to be better able to judge the state of climate science than a select committee of experts chosen by the National Academy of Science.
The basis for your claim of superior judgement is threefold:
1. Phrenology was wrong.
2. Freud was wrong.
3. Don said unkind things about you.
If this is the best you can do, your credentials are weak. In my ever so humble opinion, of course.
