Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: Should CMS be moved to obsolete packages?

Collapse
2: Re: Should CMS be moved to obsolete packages? (response to 1)
Posted by Don Baccus on 12/12/03 11:54 PM
We need to steal bits of CMS into the CR code base because it is of general use.  This is a bit of a toughy - contrib/photobook requires those pieces.
Collapse
3: Re: Should CMS be moved to obsolete packages? (response to 2)
Posted by tammy m on 12/13/03 12:00 AM
Yeah and the CMS docs actually do a lot of explaining how to use CR. And I'm using some CMS (that should probably be moved to CR) for a custom package. And does BCMS use anything from the CMS?
Collapse
4: Re: Should CMS be moved to obsolete packages? (response to 3)
Posted by Jeff Davis on 12/13/03 12:02 AM
We could rip out workflow and remove the dependency.

the useful things about CMS (besides the tcl api for content creation) are the content type and cr browsing. which have been quite useful in identifying how packages are misusing the CR.