Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: dotlrn.org

Collapse
5: Re: dotlrn.org (response to 1)
Posted by Carl Robert Blesius on
Launching the site around the 2.0 release is the plan (with a little luck we will have the new dotlrn.org site running on .LRN 2.0).

The goal is to run it off a stock .LRN install and upgrade as new releases come out.

Will be using the edit-this-page package for the content that is up now so it can be easily edited using a web browser.

Collapse
6: Re: dotlrn.org (response to 5)
Posted by Malte Sussdorff on
I'm not sure about the current release plan, but if we follow the guidelines written by Joel, aren't we at least one month away from a release ?

Would it not make sense to migrate the site now to .LRN 2.0 (current CVS checkout) and upgrade to the release once it is out. Obviously you should only do this if the packages will be upgradeable from the current checkout to the new release. But I assume this is a valid assumption to make, especially as some universities are already running a .LRN 2.0 installation which they want to upgrade once the release is out.