Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: plans for .LRN 2.0.2

Collapse
8: Re: plans for .LRN 2.0.2 (response to 5)
Posted by Malte Sussdorff on 03/01/04 11:37 AM
I might want to get survey from /contrib into distribution. As this effects .LRN, I can either wait for 2.0.3 / 2.1 or do it this week. All criteria to be a package in distribution have been met, though not enough testing is done (I don't define: "Works for me" as enough testing).
Collapse
17: Re: plans for .LRN 2.0.2 (response to 8)
Posted by Tracy Adams on 03/02/04 07:59 PM
Malte,

In light of our discussion as managing .LRN as a vertical application (or whatever name we choose) of OpenACS, I'd suggest that the question of "when is a given package a package" should be considered in the OpenACS community.  .LRN is obviously interested, but we want to manage things in a clear way. Would you be willing to bring the issue to that forum?