Forum OpenACS Development: Re: Commenting for casual browsers

Collapse
Posted by Walter McGinnis on
I still think the person route is the way to go.  One way to prevent the scenario (malicous updating of name) that you mention, is to require that someone who is using the same email to make a second comment to become a registered user.

A less intrusive option is to require authentication (i.e. migration from personhood to userhood) when a person tries to update their name.  In both cases I mention, the migration from person to user should require an email authentication.

Ultimately, I think we need more facilities for managing the different flavors of parties in the toolkit.  On the project I'm working on we have an author relation on party_id (along with other similar relations) and we are going to be using users, persons, and organizations as authors, etc.  The trick is how to manage when someone who might be an author joins the site as a user after someone with the same name has already been established as a person in the database by content managers, etc.  Who verifies that this "John Smith" is the same "John Smith" who wrote a book on bike lanes being added to streets that is listed in the content repository?  There are number of possibilies.  Any thoughts?  Perhaps I should post to a new thread.

Collapse
Posted by Tom Jackson on

If you enabled commenting per object you could do some interesting stuff. When a user creates content, they could check a box to enable comments on their content. Then any user/non-user could send a comment which would be 'moderated' by the content creator. In essence, you delegate administration and responsibility to a registered user.