Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: OpenACS assessment...

Collapse
4: Re: OpenACS assessment... (response to 3)
Posted by Jeff Davis on
Torben mentioned forking. One thing that is useful to point out relative to *Nuke's is that there seem to be as many forks as there are developers and while google will return an order of magnatude more hits for phpnuke it's not clear that if what you want is to know what is changing, what the release status is, or where to report or track a bug that that is at all a benefit.

With OpenACS we have an architecture that is modular and flexible enough and a community which is inclusive enough that we have never forked. Not having forked means there is no duplicated effort and no risk of being stranded on a fork which loses support to another version.