Yeah, Adam, probably so. What Sarah's saying, of course, is that
thus far we've offered an accurate port of OpenACS's screwed-up
behavior (though we're versions behind ACS Classic 3.4x, of course).
So ... if sarah or someone comes up with a clean fix for the module,
I'll try to find time to commit then to the cvs tree, where they'll
find there way into the OpenACS 3.2.5.
OK, for the peanut gallery - this one's an aD bug-ugly mistake.
Several recent posts have pointed out OpenACS port errors, and PG
misbehavior (UNION and ORDER BY) so it ain't all aD's fault that
OpenACS has some rough edges.
But aD does have a role in OpenACS reliability. We caught a lot of
obvious ACS Classic bugs and fixed them while porting, but missed
plenty, too - and added some of our own.
So keep these bug reports a-rollin'....
