Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: Forums Review by the UAB

Collapse
33: Re: Forums Review by the UAB (response to 25)
Posted by Dorothea Fischer-Hornung on 05/11/04 08:07 PM
Thanks, Jeff. I went thorough all your links. For me gmane was easiest to use, but I may just be a habit of using panes in the top/bottom format. But I also thought that having the name of the threads plus the subheaders clearly listed in text more accessible to me. The left navigation and the tree on google do the same thing, but looks very "techie" for a non-techie user like me.

The PhpBB has always been a favorite for me since there are so many things you can choose to do with it. It seems clean, well-structured and very user friendly.

I have no idea where this gets us, but this is this user’s opinion.

Collapse
35: Re: Forums Review by the UAB (response to 33)
Posted by Jeff Davis on 05/11/04 08:33 PM
On #5 (advanced sorting), it says "and a way of making one’s favorites and sorting accordingly."

Does that mean marking people as favorites and sorting by threads in which they have participated or marking threads as favorites?

Dorothea, are you aware of a phpBB site which does some of the different threading views (#3) that I could look at?

Collapse
39: Re: Forums Review by the UAB (response to 35)
Posted by Bruce Spear on 05/12/04 10:09 PM
I've been wondering about this sorting business.  I'd assume it would be easy and generally useful to be able to sort by date, author, and topic, but the weak point of this idea is "generally", since sorting is something we do all the time anyway without thinking.  The criteria I'd want to ponder is "relevance", and since I think in terms of the academic quarter, I think of a limited number of threads per class and that these stay in the meaningful sequence of the course/syllabus: for these purposes, we're not talking about a lot of forum postings like we have on our Dotlrn Q&A forum.  I know there are other users besides classroom, but rather than a "general" solution that might please nobody, I'd rather two or more specific solutions that you could choose to fit specific purposes.  Hence, I am concentration on the academic seminar and lecture as I know it best and think it the primary forum format for my university circles.  As an instructor, I'd like to sort by student as I think we may do well to head in the direction of the academic portfolio and a review of a student's forum postings I would want to see associated with his homework assignments, survey answers, and so collate her work, and having announced that I would do this, encourage participation in a number of formats. From a marketing and, say, attracting instructors, instead of saying we can sort the thing a dozen ways like a rubix cube that fascinates the engineer who sees the beauty in all logical possibilities, I'd rather say we can switch forum features to highlight the stages in project development, or the stages or sequences of a given student's commentaries, or a list of all forum entries containing a url students have found to fulfill an assignment and expressed in a table so we could easily collate them as a portal on this topic.  That is, I'd recommend that designers conduct interviews and observations of classroom activities, compile lists of specific needs that might be served, and build components such as forums that can be switched from one precise use to another rather than including all and so leveling the precision of each.  How about that?