Forum OpenACS Development: Re: How to handle dotlrn-specific changes in core?

Collapse
Posted by Andrew Grumet on
The signature Jeff proposes is basically what I had in mind.  Formalizing the naming convention, and perhaps putting the string "callbacks" somewhere in the namespace as a safety, would then allow us to track down the stuff to call using "info procs".

On a brief skim I think APM callbacks have a similar signature but that APM ultimately stores the callback in the db.  We'd be generalizing that design and moving the storage from the db to Tcl memory.