Forum OpenACS Q&A: RFC: Announcement Forum

Collapse
Posted by Jade Rubick on
In light of our recent discussion on security issues, I'd like to propose that we create an Announcement Forum.

Many people hate creating new forums, but I think this is essential. This would be a place for people who want the bare minimum of info would subscribe to

Examples:

  • announcements of new packages
  • security announcements
  • announcements of new releases
  • etc.
Almost every software community in the world has such a thing, usually in the form of a mailing list for announcements.

Any objections or comments on this? I'd be happy to be the moderator on the list.

I would also suggest that important announcements also go in the News section of the site, but people shouldn't have to monitor the webpage to hear about a security alert. Although I look at the site every day, we shouldn't make that a requirement for OpenACS developers and the non-developers who set up our software.

Collapse
Posted by Jeroen van Dongen on
I do agree that it is a good idea to have such a thing, however I'd vote for a real 'security only' list. Otherwise there is a risk of 'scope creep' with the traffic volume increasing, discouraging people from subscribing.

A good example is in this case the debian security archives - they are succesfull because they are kept strictly 'security only'.

To combat the 'fragmentation issue' - keep the security announcement list strictly to announcements. As soon as it turns into a discussion, redirect to the normal dev or q&a lists.

Maybe the 'news' package is a better fit in this case. With an extension so that 'post news item' results in 'create matching forum thread' and link to it in the news item.

This way you have best of both worlds
- an explicit trigger for important announcements
- no fragmentation of discussions