Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: .LRN 2.1 update

Collapse
2: Re: .LRN 2.1 update (response to 1)
Posted by Rocael Hernández Rizzardini on
Hello Tracy,

its the oacs-5-1 branch that you'll tag sunday night as dotlrn-2-1-alpha...
Also, this release should come with the openacs-5-1-2 release (cut), its time to do it, OCT?
For the openacs-5-1-2 there's a need to integrate the latest changes on the catalogs (as usual).
But this new openacs-5-1-2 release should come with the dotlrn-2-1-RC1, don't you think?

Collapse
3: Re: .LRN 2.1 update (response to 2)
Posted by Tracy Adams on
<blockquote>>But this new openacs-5-1-2 release should come with the dotlrn-2-1-RC1, don't you think?
</blockquote>

Yes, I'd agree.  If openacs-5-1-2 comes soon (next few weeks), then we'd use that as the core in any of the .LRN 2-1 releases that come after openacs-5-1-2 is released.