Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: .LRN releases

Collapse
4: Re: .LRN releases (response to 1)
Posted by Rocael Hernández Rizzardini on
Hello Bruce & Al,

thanks for your comments, I wanna be simple, then for me:

Usability = UAB

Yes, please Bruce, start a thread on this forum about short term priorities on UI improvements, lets identify our weakness and post solutions, and now, at least Galileo (E-LANE) will work on this starting in about 1 month.

I want to remember my point of view: "we need short term release cycles", we'll keep everybody happy, more bug-fixes, more suggestions from UAB in the toolkit, more competitive, more functionalities and avoid to repeat the extremely slow and painful process that has been the release of .LRN 2.1.0.

We need to increase the momentum:
1. with the UAB
2. with the software releases
3. with new adopters / real scenarios using .LRN
4. with the Marketing (MK) effort

p.d. LORS + Assessment + Evaluation are important for E-LANE and .LRN itself, so we'll put effort to make them become part of the official .LRN release.