Forum OpenACS Q&A: Response to OpenACS situation -- IMPORTANT

Collapse
Posted by Don Baccus on
<blockquote><i>So first, overall, I think Ben is doing a wonderful job. I believe he is a tremendous developer, leader and spokesman and responsible for all the success
    of the OpenACS today.</i></blockquote>
Gee, thanks, Jerry ... glad to hear that Ben did it all by himself.  I thought only Philip held that view.
<p>Maybe I *should* step down, sheesh ...
<blockquote><i>In no way shape or form do I want to diminish his leadership role in this community.</i></blockquote>
Really?  Yet earlier you said ...
<blockquote><i>
It is almost certainly the case that having a more formal organization would involve asking you and Ben to have less control over certain OpenACS
    outcomes.</i></blockquote>
I'm having some trouble reconciling these two statements, sorry.
<p>If Ben's big sin is the fact that he doesn't always answer e-mail promptly, I fail to see how a steering committee elected by the community would cause his e-mail to be answered more quickly.  The cure seems remarkably unrelated to the disease.
<p>Besides which, I *do* answer e-mail promptly, and you can always e-mail me if you don't get an answer from Ben ...