"Open Source, executed with care, is a great way to go global" December 20-26 edition, pages 19-20. Discusses Both OpenACS and .LRN, describes size and momentum of project, uses MIT Sloan as case study. They got the "25%" cost advantage wrong (should be 75%), but I've contacted the copywriter who changed my original text (where it was correct) to see if he'll print a clarification. (Mass High Tech is a weekly newspaper covering what its title describes, I'll provide a link when available online.) Many thanks to Jack Jackson, who helped us with the press outreach around the .LRN Consortium formation, for arranging this writing opportunity. I hope this will be useful to other OpenACS / .LRN promotion efforts.
