Uh. I don't to mean to be a party pooper, but can you rename
ACES to ACS 3.5? Doesn't the copyright holder for ACS have to
agree to this kind of name change?
On a side note, making a very specific configuration of ACS be
the name holder rubs me the wrong way. ACS 3.4 can do a lot
that is not readily apparent in the ACES version. I think you
actually create confusion by doing this sort of renaming. The
lineage becomes fuzzy.
I guess people can always grab ACS 3.4 or OpenACS 3.x if they
want to have finer grain control of the configuration of their site...
