>> you could count the clients/users who did so on one hand.
> without having to resort to using fingers.
Not true at all. Saying that suggests that not being in the > position of selling the OpenACS.
Wait, are saying there was more than 1 client who
really used mod_aolserver? I don't know of any
and I doubt there was more than one -- if you know
who did use it I would be interested in hearing about it.
I don't dispute that if we could use apache it would open
some doors but given that mod_aolserver did get written and
it did not spark any real additional interest in ACS
as far as I could tell, why it would be different now?