Forum OpenACS Q&A: Response to Time for a name change?

Collapse
Posted by Jun Yamog on
Hi,

I agree with Joel and Sean that it must be short and 2 syllables.  We are going to create a brand not some acronym that explains the toolkit.  What does "Java" had to with a language?  Also like Sean we must drop the "Open".  We dont need to emphasize Open or Community once the brand is accosiated with this great Open Community Toolkit.

Also the ad_my_neato_proc_name mentioned by Sean is something that will be hard to remove, much like ns_my_neato_proc was never changed on Aolserver which used to be naviserver (is that spelling correct?).
I vote to change the name to remove the current confusion with aD.  I vote the name to be simple and unrelated to project like "Coke, Kodak, Java, etc."  Linux... what the heck does the Linux word relate to a kernel. They mean nothing we just need to finding something easy to remember and nobody has used it like "ximian".Bluetooth....Viagra

I am sorry that I am not good at names but here are my weird suggestions.

- Josean (Joel + Sean hehehe)

- Ogora (since Agora is getting some votes here)

- Alexure (after Alex)

- Evander (after Eve Anderson she will probably not mind)

- PhilGee (gives the name history and easy to pronounce)

- Crossminds

- Catapult (OACS does catapult me ahead of other developers)

- Blue Digits

- Starter

- Piston (just like an engine)

- Head Start - this looks good as it conveys the real benefit of this tool kit.

Hmmm I think I like "Head Start" its simple and conveys the real advantage of OACS.  Its a head start on building web application.  The  downsides are its only applicable in English and maybe confused with other stuff.

Head Start - gives you a head start in building web applications.