Forum OpenACS Q&A: Response to Time for a name change?

Collapse
125: Response to Time for a name change? (response to 1)
Posted by Don Baccus on 01/03/02 10:03 PM
Not bad, not bad at all ... what do others think?

I may put up a poll soon to ask some metaquestions, i.e. should we ...

1. Leave project and toolkit name alone

2. Leave project name for now, OACS 3.2.5 name alone forever, change name of 4.x

3. Change the world, ditch "the seal" (the seal? :) :) )

4. Change name but keep the same/similar acronym (OpenACS or OACS)

Something like that.  Would this be useful in steering things?  If 90%  choose #4, for example, people can stop trying to come up with brand-new names (my personal vote is for #2 at the moment).