Forum OpenACS Development: Response to OACS content repository services

Collapse
Posted by Lee Denison on
Whilst I'm thinking about it.

Why are folders and categories treated separately?  Is it for performance reasons when dispatching a request for an item?  Is it because folders are the canonical taxonomy when dispatching a request for an item?

Is there a distinction between a taxonomy of categories in which a content item is placed, and a set of keywords assigned to a content item?

I would say that an item is likely to exist at only one point in a category tree whereas it is likely to have many keywords associated with it.  I would also say that if categories a more likely to be organised in a tree so that an item automatically exists in the parent categories of it's direct category association - whereas keywords are more likely to be in a flat structure with thesaurus type relations between them.  Do these distinctions matter?