Hi Don and all!
It might not be so important to address the issue right now, since
the name OpenACS has some recognition in the world, as a good toolkit,
and it might not be prudent to rebrand.
There is already the task sometimes of explaining about the Tcl
version, the Java version, acs 3.x, acs 4.x etc etc. So, why invite
more questions with another name change. Like you suggest we can
have a simple change and call it "Open Architecture...".
Nice to be back. cheers.
