Hi Dorian,
I was in Madrid, but I somehow missed the followup to the bug bash.
Now, the are bugs listed in
https://openacs.org/bugtracker/openacs/?format=table&page=10&f%5fstate=7&orderby=submitter%2casc&project%5fid=56106
(sorted by submitter, browse to your name)
it's a total of 23 bugs, of which
3 for "A" level
9 for "AA" level
11 for "AAA" level
i wonder whether we could say dotlrn is at least "A" and put up the corresponding logo, at least on dotlrn site, by fixing those 3 bugs....
Something is quite weird here:
Bug #2445 - script was written to replace empty alt. (ehy i think i wrote this script, and it ran in madrid bug bash...!)
Bug #2449 Fix has been made. Just needs to be tested.
Bug #2450 Fix has been made. Just needs to be tested.
now... those are the 3 "A" level bugs.
hence it seems .LRN is already at a "A" level, still we don't know it... or maybe some last step has to be done...
opinions ?
thanks
