Thanks Tilmann,
Is there anything wrong with using Apache vs. NSVHR? The reason I am asking is because when I was doing a search for 'virtual domains' here, seems like people are using a seperate Apache process just to handle the proxying and then running AOLserver to handle the site.
If I do use AOLserver to do it all, I should run the VAT module instead of the NSVHR right? since that offers better logging and the ability to run it all off one AOLserver process.
I've checked the release notes of OACS4 and it seems that a lot of the modules are still alpha. Does that mean that, they are alpha because there hasn't been thorough testing for stability or alpha because they haven't been fully ported to PG and won't work properly?
reason I'm asking is because I'm not a programer and if anything bad happens, the only way I know how to fix it is to rebuild the whole system...
thanks
edwin
