So I wonder, if I (and ETP) use the rp_serve_abstract_file wrongly ...
A question for the implementors of ETP (since that's where you got the idea to abuse rp_serve_abstract_file). Here's the header for rp_serve_abstract_file:
ad_proc -private rp_serve_abstract_file
Which part of "-private" don't folks understand?
In general the request processor is one of the best bits of the core when it comes to being annotated with "-public", "-private", and "-deprecated". Those annotations are there for a reason. If there was a simple way to enforce "-private" in the toolkit we would.
