Caroline
As you know I'm a strong supported of getting a process like the one for openacs working on dotlrn. Hopefully we can get it rolling in the next few weeks. It would be good if you could lead the way...
I think the underlying opinion of people is between lines in your statement 'it is dotLRN's decision to set things up in this way'.
I think the dotLRN *consortium* has kept itself out of the technical decisions, mostly for lack of time/resources to follow them up.
But dotlrn is all of us. While the consortium has been quiet for a while a lot of other things are happening.
While some people argue that the next step (after we release 2.2) is to improve the code base (with big technical things) I think my two personal priorities have to do with 1) management of the development process 2) getting a community of educators behind the project.
I proposed this last issue last May in Madrid but we have not been successful im making it happen.
Ideas would be very welcome
rafa
