Stephen: I agree with Al, this should cover what is packaged and distributed
as dotLRN, not fixes and things that are generic and rolled back into
OpenACS. OpenACS governance remains independent.
Here is my proposal for dotLRN governance:
http://
https://web.archive.org/web/20020810194617/dotlrn.openforce.net/
You'll notice a number of common points (Al and I went back and forth on
these proposals), but a noticeable difference on the overall philosophy of who
drives development and how. Please send comments!
