As we all know, the intended workflow of the OpenACS bug-tracker is as follows:

This means that the person who opened an issue, should finally close the issue, after having checked that the proposed fix from the maintainer fixes actually the original issue. I think, this is a very reasonable model [1].
However, in reality, we have in the OpenACS bug-tracker several hundred issues, which were resolved long ago, but where the person who entered originally the issue forgot to close the bug (or maybe was not aware about this duty).
My proposal is:
a) close all issues, which were resolved >2 years ago, which are still open
b) implement in the future some reminder system that send to the issuer an email to check the result and to close the issue when satisfied, and maybe one more one month later.
Is everybody fine with this?
-gn
[1] https://openacs.org/doc/bug-tracker/bug-tracker-spec