Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: OpenACS relative to RedHat ECM

Collapse
Posted by Peter Marklund on
I have worked for aD and have quite a lot of experience with both ACS Java (or ECM, or CCM, or whatever it's called these days) and ACS TCL / OpenACS, and I clearly prefer the latter. Primary reasons for this are that OpenACS has a live open source community, allows for more rapid development than ACS Java, and is vastly simpler to understand architecture wise and to modify to your needs. I suggest that you take a look at dotLRN and our dotWRK demo server, which Lars threw together in like an afternoon to show what dotLRN might look like when used by a company. I agree that the look and feel of the ECM screenshot is very nice and I could well imagine changing some templates to make dotLRN look like that.
Collapse
Posted by Chip Mefford on
Well Peter;

You nailed it.
I was stunned by the dotWRK demo.

That is no futher off my mark than
the RedHat ECM. And of course, license
and architecture wise, quite a bit
closer.