Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: rl_returnz turned on at openacs.org

Collapse
Posted by Frank N. on
Jeff, our messages crossed.

You've got a point there re. not taking NS4.0* into account in the general case. Also the current mod_gzip docs do suggest a more strict regexp for matching the way you describe:

mod_gzip_item_exclude        reqheader  "User-agent: Mozilla/4.0[678]"

The reason why I am slightly concerned about this, is that I am working on a project, where the target audience statistically is a low income demographic. I know for a fact that many of the persons, who might be interested in what I am working on, still do use very old machinery on modem connections. Ie. Windows 95 is still in use out there with who knows what for a browser. So gzipped content would be especially valuable for the clients on modems in those cases where it works reliably.

Collapse
Posted by Jeff Davis on
Yeah, that's a good point. I can muster some sympathy for someone on a slow machine on an unreliable dialup I guess.

On the .js, .css issue in openacs now we don't really ns_return any .js or .css so it's sort of a nonissue (although I can see doing dynamic css at least). I am not sure if the .js and .css problem is addressed by the IE padding (I think it is, certainly the printing problems are).

Same thing and WWW-Authenticate, most openacs sites don't really use it (and for those that do I expect it is during devlopement and most of the people looking have modern browsers which just do the right thing).

Maybe someone will address those issues, but so far they don't really seem to have been a problem (and rubylane for example gets a lot of traffic and I would think it probably sees more old browsers than most sites and Jim Wilcoxson has said they don't have problems with the gzip encoding).