Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: OpenACS 4.6 does not yet work with Oracle 9i?

Collapse
Posted by Don Baccus on
That doesn't sound bad at all ...

For parameters I'd love to switch parameter names to the convention we began on the PG side ... p_foo rather than foo (which nicely complements the v_foo style for variables.)

But with all the calls that use named parameters that's probably impractical.  It would make things more readable ...

It's ironic that I had it backwards - it is the fully-qualified form that fails rather than the unqualified form!  That's bizarre, frankly.  Both should work within a package itself if Oracle followed normal scoping rules for Ada-ish languages, but, hell, I'm just a compiler writer, what do *I* know?