If you read the vision statement then you'd see that I propose to split the work. One part indeed being creating a 'common substrate'.
Whether that is a separate package, dotLRN related stuff back-ported into oacs or something else is of course open for discussion.
In case there's any doubt: I'm not trying to force the *result* in any particular direction, I'm trying to force the *process* in a particular direction.
And so far a lot of people seem to have slightly different ideas when they hear 'dotWRK' - we need to resolve that first before we jump into solutions for yet vaguely defined problems. This thread is meant to get everybody explicitly on the same page.
As soon as there are some more posts I'll do another summarization attempt.
