Forum OpenACS Development: Re: Upgrade to xowiki 0.52

Collapse
Posted by Matthew Coupe on
Hi Gustaf,

I'm having a bit fo a nightmare with this today!

I followed your advice and installed version 0.47, now when I try to go to the admin pages of an xowiki instance I am getting the following: (Same thing with 0.48 too. I tried a version from head again and it had problems with oacs-view with the category tree)

Thanks so much for your help, I'm determined to get a working version as this package has so much to offer!

invalid command name "::xowiki::Form"
while executing
"$object_type instance_select_query -folder_id [::$package_id set folder_id] -count 1 -with_subtypes false"
invoked from within
"db_list count [$object_type instance_select_query -folder_id [::$package_id set folder_id] -count 1 -with_subtypes false]"
invoked from within
"t1 add -object_type $object_type -instances [db_list count [$object_type instance_select_query -folder_id [::$package_id set folder_id] -count 1 -..."
("uplevel" body line 4)
invoked from within
"uplevel 1 $code_block "
("1" arm line 1)
invoked from within
"switch $errno {
0 {
# TCL_OK
}
1 {
# TCL_ERROR
..."
("while" body line 20)
invoked from within
"while { [db_getrow $db $selection] } {
incr counter
if { [info exists array_val] } {
unset array_val
..."
("uplevel" body line 5)
invoked from within
"uplevel 1 $code_block "
invoked from within
"db_with_handle -dbn $dbn db {
set selection [db_exec select $db $full_statement_name $sql]

set counter 0
while { [db_getrow $..."
(procedure "db_foreach" line 36)
invoked from within
"db_foreach type_select "select object_type from acs_object_types where
tree_sortkey between :object_type_key and tree_right(:object_type_key..."
("uplevel" body line 35)
invoked from within
"uplevel {
::xowiki::Package initialize -ad_doc {

This is the admin page for the package. It displays all of the types
of wiki pages provides li..."
(procedure "code::tcl::/var/lib/aolserver/dotlrndev/packages/xowiki/www/..." line 2)
invoked from within
"code::tcl::$__adp_stub"
invoked from within
"if { [file exists $__adp_stub.tcl] } {

# ensure that data source preparation procedure exists and is up-to-date
adp_init tcl $__adp_stub
..."
("uplevel" body line 3)
invoked from within
"uplevel {

if { [file exists $__adp_stub.tcl] } {

# ensure that data source preparation procedure exists and is up-to-date
adp_init t..."
(procedure "adp_prepare" line 2)
invoked from within
"adp_prepare "
(procedure "template::adp_parse" line 30)
invoked from within
"template::adp_parse [file root [ad_conn file]] {}"
(procedure "adp_parse_ad_conn_file" line 5)
invoked from within
"$handler"
("uplevel" body line 2)
invoked from within
"uplevel $code"
invoked from within
"ad_try {
$handler
} ad_script_abort val {
# do nothing
}"
invoked from within
"rp_serve_concrete_file [ad_conn file]"
(procedure "rp_serve_abstract_file" line 60)
invoked from within
"rp_serve_abstract_file "$root/$path""
("uplevel" body line 2)
invoked from within
"uplevel $code"
invoked from within
"ad_try {
rp_serve_abstract_file "$root/$path"
set tcl_url2file([ad_conn url]) [ad_conn file]
set tcl_url2path_info..."

Collapse
Posted by Gustaf Neumann on
Matthew, this does not look good. you have parts of the newest and somewhat experimental stuff in the databse, and there are no "downgrade" scripts from new versions into old version. ::xowiki::Form and ::xowiki::FormInstance are extensions of ::xowiki::PageTemplate and ::xowiki::PageInstance, which might be merged before the release. Both classes are very new, you will get the same problems with every other older version now as well.

The following to sql calls should most probably work to downgrade

select acs_object_type__drop_type('::xowiki::Form','t') from dual;
select acs_object_type__drop_type('::xowiki::FormInstance','t') from dual;

If not, i would say, stay for now with the head version.

-gustaf

Collapse
Posted by Matthew Coupe on
No problem Gustaf, working on a dev machine anyway so I can start afresh on Monday if the scripts don't work.

We are running 0.37 in production so I'll try going straight to version 0.47 from there as that seems like a reasonable release - I feel like I'm missing out if I go too low on the version! We're not due to release the stuff we're working on for a couple of months so maybe by then there will be a further stable upgrade.

Thanks for all of the help.